Advanced Search
McHale's Navy: The McHale Mob
DO NOT SELL. The "McHale Mob" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Comrades of PT 73
DO NOT SELL. The "Comrades of PT 73" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy series, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Ensign Parker, ESP
DO NOT SELL. The "Ensign Parker, ESP" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Evil Eye Parker
DO NOT SELL. The "Evil Eye Parker" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy series, "McHale's Navy".
Snow mountains, clouds, old man
Brandt's Cormorant
Master 2110, Tape 1 Very Brief MS of Brand'ts cormorant (Phalacrocorax penicillatus) diving under the surface of the water (fishing)
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.06.35--cut to committee room] The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. 'The Chair wishes to announce that pursuant to the policy adopted when we considered the rule of procedure for this debate, that it contemplated that there be general debate for a period not to exceed ours and that it -was understood as agreed policy that the balance the time for the consideration of amendments to the articles would consume more than 20 hours. The Chair -wishes to point out that having commenced with the consideration of the articles yesterday for purposes of amendment, 12 hours have already been consumed of that time. However, as the committee certainly understands, the committee can extend time for consideration of the articles for purposes of amendment until -we have resolved the entire question. The Chair would like to state that in the light of some of the motions to strike -which are presently before the Chair, the Chair intends to recognize after a motion to strike has been proffered as an amendment to article I and to each paragraph thereafter that after an hour's debate has expired, the Chair is going to entertain a motion to move the question and that the question will then be in order. Mr. HUTCHINSON. Will the chairman yield? The CHAIRMAN. I recognize the gentleman from Michigan. Mr. HUTCHINSON. I thank the chairman for yielding. I Would not want there to be any misunderstanding about the time limited for debate. MY recollection is, Mr. Chairman, that in earlier version of the rule which was adopted, there was a 20-hour limitation for amendment but that in the final version the wording was worked around the concept of the 5-minute rule and the provision does not limit debate to a total of 20 hours, and that while there was an expression of hope that it could be accomplished in that length of time, still if 12 hours have already been consumed and we have not yet disposed of article I, it becomes very obvious, Mr. Chairman. that it will be necessary to consume more than 20 hours to handle these articles and in order to extend, beyond 20 hours, Mr. Chairman, I do not think it would take any formal action of the committee to extend the time for debate beyond that 20 hours. With regard to limiting debate on a motion to strike to 1 hour Mr. Chairman, an I would indicate that I certainly would interpose an objection to that. Mr. SANDMAN. Mr. Chairman, reserving the right to object- The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Sandman. Mr. SANDMAN. [continuing]. And I shall not object, I would like to say, and I hope that others will agree who took the position I did yesterday that the argument, was exhausted as far as I am concerned yesterday on the articles of impeachment along the line that I suggested. A vote has been taken. There. are amendments on the desk that have my name on them and I would like to withdraw those because they are aimed at the same point of law that we discussed at great length yesterday. It is my hope, Mr. Chairman, that we will be able to proceed with article I with the degree of discipline that existed yesterday and with last night, no doubt continuing today. There is no way that the outcome of this vote is going to be changed by debate and 1, therefore, hope that; we can with dispatch cover the Sarbanes substitute and there will be no objections from me, no amendments from me, nor will there be any motions to strike from me. [00.11.44]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.11.44] Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman? Mr. FLOWERS. Mr. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Flowers. Mr. FLOWERS. If I might be recognized for a short minute, knowing of my friend from New Jersey's conservative bent which I shareI would ask if he would be opposed to my borrowing the paper that has already got at the desk and at all of our desks and adopt for in purposes the same motion to strike that he has proffered to subsection 1, I would be prepared at the appropriate time to offer this motion to subparagraph 2. It is important to me, to know here in these debates that we are having this week, in this committee, on the allegations that are contained in article I and if there are any other articles to them, the specifies the charge. I believe this is important. The gentleman from Wisconsin I think agrees with me on this. We discussed it here in the committee last evening. So I propose, Mr. Chairman, I take this time merely to point out It, would be my purpose to offer a motion to strike the Various paragraphs to seek out the information that would support the paragraphs from the members of the counsel. Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman. ? THE CHAIRMAN. Mr. Railsback. Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment that I would like the clerk to read. The CHAIRMAN. If the gentleman will defer, the Chair was not recognizing the gentleman for purposes of offering an amendment since I believe that at this time the Chair is going to state that it is going to be its policy to first recognize those who have perfecting amendments, and I had already indicated to Mr. Hogan that I would recognize Mr. Hogan for that purpose. MY. RAILSBACK. Am I recognized for the other purpose, then ? The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman will be recognized, and I would like to also state that if the gentleman from Alabama was asking that, his name be substituted for "that of Mr. Sandman which appears on the motions to strike that are on the clerk's desk, if there is no objection, I will entertain that so that the gentleman would have that properly before the clerk's desk if it is not.. Mr. RANGEL. -111'. Chairman? Mr. RAILSBACK. Mr. Chairman, I think I still have the time, do I Not? The CHAIRMAN. the time is reserved to the gentleman for offering his motion after the gentleman from Maryland, RAILSBACK. No. That is not what I wanted to speak on. I wanted to congratulate my friend from New Jersey. He says it is about time [Laughter] for doing something that I think is very wise and very Prudent and very thoughtful on his part and also in the best interests of this committee, and once again I think that he has shown his good sense. As far as my good friend, Mr. Flowers, is concerned, I hope that if he does move to strike every single numbered item that we maybe can expedite the debate on each item because frankly, I think lot of us thought that there was a great deal of repetition last night, and I think we ought to be able to either present the case for or against in a little bit more expeditious manner. I will yield back, Mr. Chairman. [00.15.19]
Luci And Pat Wed: Marriage Day, Beauty And Splendor
Luci Baines Johnson, 19, becomes the bride of Patrick John Nugent 23, in a ceremony of solemn splendor in Washington's National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. Later, 700 guests attend the gala reception at the White House before the newlyweds depart for a honeymoon in the Bahamas. The Groom and his ushers walking up the stairs of the church. CU - Patrick John Nugent (groom) High Angle Shot - Throngs including nuns patiently await the arrival of President Johnson and his family. MS - President Lyndon Baines Johnson (father of the bride) standing outside his limousine, and here comes the youngest daughter, Luci Baines Johnson, in her wedding dress disembarking from the limousine (Luci is wearing a very tailored wedding dress) Luci is holding a simple but elegant wedding bouquet. MS - A father (who just so happens to be the President) and his daughter, the bride, walking up the steps of the church, Shrine of the Immaculate Conception. MS - President Lyndon Baines Johnson, Luci Baines Johnson, and the First Lady (Lady Bird Johnson). MS - Patrick John Nugent (groom) and Luci Baines Johnson (bride) kneeling down as the priest proceeds with the wedding ceremony. MS - The church doors open and the press comes spilling out. MS - Mr. & Mrs. Patrick John Nugent, husband and wife. CU - The crowd including nuns. CUS - Luci Baines waves to the crowd with a rosary wrapped around her fingers. MS - The newlyweds are seated in the clear plastic roof limousine waving to the crowd of people. MS - Standing on the balcony of the White House are the President and Mrs. Johnson, Luci and Patrick and his parents. MS - The wedding cake, it looks to be 12 feet high. CUS - Bride and groom cutting the first piece of cake, Luci still has the rosary wrapped around her hand. MS - Luci and Patrick posing for some pictures. MS - Luci and Patrick walking in back of the White House.
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.21.59] The CHAIRMAN. The Chair would like to point out that while the rule has yet to be established since that will be a matter before the Rules Committee, the Chair is certainly going to recommend that there will be full and free debate, as this is a matter of such moment and be Considered as it should be considered deliberately and fully by the full House, and therefore, I think that the members recitation of what could be expected is indeed in order. Now I recognize for a parliamentary inquiry the gentleman from California, Mr. Danielson. Mr. DANIELSON. Mr. Chairman, at the appropriate time I will wish to Offer a perfecting amendment to paragraph 4 of article 1. I wish to reserve the right of offering that amendment, and I do inquire as to when would be the appropriate time? The CHAIRMAN-. Perfecting amendments are in order at any time. The, bill is now being read by way of vehicle of the substitute and it is amendable at any stage. Mr. DANIELSON. Should the amendment be. offered at the time we take up subparagraph 4: for consideration? The CHAIRMAN. No; the,, amendment may be offered at, any time. But I am now going to, for the purposes of recognizing Mr. Hogan, , who has already proposed perfecting amendments, I will recognize him for 5 minutes. The clerk, however, has not read his amendment. Mr. HOGAN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have two amendments at the desk, 'Mr. Chairman, and I would ask unanimous consent that I be permitted to address myself to both of them at the same time, and that we vote, on them at the same time. The CHAIRMAN. Without objection it is so ordered. The, clerk will read the amendments The CLERK [reading] Amendment by 'Mr. Hogan: [text of amendment] On page I or article 1, on the second paragraph, and on page 2, paragraph 5 strike "illegal entry," where it occurs and insert in lieu thereof "unlawful" entry." Amendment by 'Mr. Hogan: On page 1 of paragraph 3, quoting subparagraph " (number 1)" after the word "making," insert the following new language: Causing to be made." The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Maryland. Mr. HOGAN. Mr. Chairman, we should be aware that my amendments are to the Sarbanes substitute which is before us. Mr. DENNIS. 'Mr. Chairman, we have no copy of the second. amendment Mr. HOGAN. Mr. Chairman, I believe they are being distributed . Am I recognized, Mr. r. Chairman? The CHAIRMAN_ The gentleman is recognized for 5 minutes. Mr. HOGAN. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When I returned last night my wife, who had been watching deliberations on television, reminded me that many of the prior Impeachments -were not, handled by the Judiciary Committee, and she wondered if the deliberations would take as long if Speaker Albert had entertained sending it to a select committee made up of no lawyers, if it would take us as long to complete it. She also then said that she understands full. well why lawyers are barred from serving on grand Juries. Having said that, I have before the committee two what I guess could be fairly--be characterized as legalistic amendments. However, I do think they are important. Addressing myself to the first one, Mr. Chairman, where we use word "illegal entry," rather than unlawful, I noted that in the Code title 22m, section 1801, a burglary is entry with intent to break and carry away any part thereof. And while the Watergate. burglary is very frequently referred to as burglary, it, is not strictly speaking, according to the D.C. Code, a burglary. It is a breaking and entering. So, what my amendment does it tries to track the language Of the statute in title 22, section 3102, relating to unlawful entry on property. It also I understand, tracks the language in some of" the indictments on conspiracy . Now, I do think that while it may seem to be a miniscule change, I think it strengthening the situation by having it more accurate. Second, Mr. Chairman. in paragraph I after the word "making," include "or causing to be made," as I think the record substantially supports the addition of this language. While the President did personally, in fact. make false and misleading statements, he also induced others to make false and misleading statements. So, I would urge that both of these amendments, which. I consider perfecting amendments, be adopted 'I yield back the balance of my time.
Bathing cows, washing clothes
Sikkem - Kalimpong - Bodnath??
Village, mountains, women washing
Bhutan??, Pedong
India - misc. cities, and towns
India - South - cities - and towns
This is India - Delhi - old and new
India - New and old Delhi
Cecil hold - man dives
New Delhi - Studio ?? Graham
India - title (Graham)
ON PREVIEW CASSETTE 95519 Snake charmers - monkeys - dance b/w
Indian Culture - Hindu Ritual
Indian Culture - Hindu Ritual
India - Beggars lying on street